http://betfree.oneminutesite.it

 
Share

Josef – The Story of a Survivor

Josef, a 75-year-old Ukrainian Jew, is a Holocaust survivor. During World War II he was imprisoned at the notorious Nazi death camp at Auschwitz. For many years, Josef kept his horrific stories of the events during the war to himself.

But recently, after encouragement from a worker at a local Hesed center funded by The Fellowship’s Isaiah 58 program, he began telling his story. The center is a place of hope for Josef, where this impoverished man receives food and medical assistance on a regular basis. And now, it has also given him a means of release and a sense that his history will not be forgotten.

Josef began by saying, “I was working in the coal mine when the frontline was approaching. We marched in lines wearing prison clothes. We had wooden soles on our boots. It was cold and people were weak. Those who couldn’t go further were killed and stayed where they lay. We were driven forward this way for three days, day and night. When we felt that the front was coming nearer to us, we were put into carriages where the coal was usually kept. We were piled one on top of another.

“As we rode in the carriages, somehow people from one of the villages we were passing through learned that prisoners were in the carriage, so they threw us bread and meat. We were weak and hungry. We tried to catch the pieces of food. People were so hungry that the crowd crushed each other trying to get the food. The Nazi guards shouted, ‘Halt!’ and they shot the prisoners. A lot of people were killed. The guards made us take the bodies and stack them inside the carriage like a bench. Then they made us sit on them. Three days more days we lived through that, imagining the day when we could escape.

“Finally they took us from the carriage. Then they put us in columns and we began marching again. Many days passed. We found ourselves in a small forest. Suddenly we stopped and looked around and there were no guards around. It was night, dark. We saw a big barn. Very carefully, we approached the barn, crawled in, and slept there all night. We didn’t hear a tank coming near. We woke up and saw light between the boards in the barn. We looked out and saw a five-angled star. We didn’t know that Englishmen and Americans had a five-angled star too.”

At first, Josef and the others thought they were seeing a Russian tank. He continued, “We started whispering, ‘It’s a Russian tank, it’s a Russian tank.’ Then we understood that they were Americans.

“When the Americans found us, they were struck dumb at what we looked like. We were kids and there were middle aged people there too. The soldiers handed us chocolates and vitamins and water. I felt the strength coming into my muscles again. The soldiers told us how to get to the road. The American soldiers in jeeps came near I will remember them all my life. There were about 80 of us at that time. They took us to a town in Germany and settled us there, in former Nazi housing. We took off our prison clothes and they showed us piles of clothes and told us to take what we wanted. We washed, they fed us, and there were doctors there.”

Josef humbly thanked us for listening to his story. And, before we left, he added a heartfelt note of thanks to The Fellowship’s Isaiah 58 donors who he also regards as heroes for funding the Hesed center where he receives so much support. “Thank you for the help you are providing. Give these good people my regards.” He continued, “I pray there will be peace for them.”

Without the love and compassion of the Fellowship staff, Josef’s story might never have been told and without the Fellowship-funded Hesed center, Josef might not be alive today. Shockingly, tens of thousands of Holocaust survivors like Josef are living in the former Soviet Union in abject poverty, unable to afford basic necessities such as food and medicine. You can help these struggling elderly Jews find a measure of peace and comfort in their old age through a gift to Isaiah 58

 

 

 
Share

PM adviser’s letter to ‘New York Times’
By JERUSLAEM POST STAFF
12/16/2011 08:47

Netanyahu’s senior adviser Ron Dermer writes letter to ‘New York Times’ explaining why PM “respectfully declined” to write op-ed piece.
Talkbacks (40)

Dear Sasha,
I received your email requesting that Prime Minister Netanyahu submit an op-ed to the New York Times.  Unfortunately, we must respectfully decline.

On matters relating to Israel, the op-ed page of the “paper of record” has failed to heed the late Senator Moynihan’s admonition that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but that no one is entitled to their own facts.

A case in point was your decision last May to publish the following bit of historical revision by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas:

It is important to note that the last time the question of Palestinian statehood took center stage at the General Assembly, the question posed to the international community was whether our homeland should be partitioned into two states. In November 1947, the General Assembly made its recommendation and answered in the affirmative.  Shortly thereafter, Zionist forces expelled Palestinian Arabs to ensure a decisive Jewish majority in the future state of Israel, and Arab armies intervened. War and further expulsions ensued.
This paragraph effectively turns on its head an event within living memory in which the Palestinians rejected the UN partition plan accepted by the Jews and then joined five Arab states in launching a war to annihilate the embryonic Jewish state.  It should not have made it past the most rudimentary fact-checking.

The opinions of some of your regular columnists regarding Israel are well known.   They consistently distort the positions of our government and ignore the steps it has taken to advance peace.   They cavalierly defame our country by suggesting that marginal phenomena condemned by Prime Minister Netanyahu and virtually every Israeli official somehow reflects government policy or Israeli society as a whole.  Worse, one columnist even stooped to suggesting that the strong expressions of support for Prime Minister Netanyahu during his speech this year to Congress was “bought and paid for by the Israel lobby” rather than a reflection of the broad support for Israel among the American people.

Yet instead of trying to balance these views with a different opinion, it would seem as if the surest way to get an op-ed published in the New York Times these days, no matter how obscure the writer or the viewpoint, is to attack Israel.    Even so, the recent piece on “Pinkwashing,” in which Israel is vilified for having the temerity to champion its record on gay-rights, set a new bar that will be hard for you to lower in the future.

Not to be accused of cherry-picking to prove a point, I discovered that during the last three months (September through November) you published 20 op-eds about Israel in the New York Times and Palestinian Arabs.   After dividing the op-eds into two categories, “positive” and “negative,” with “negative” meaning an attack against the State of Israel or the policies of its democratically elected government, I found that 19 out of 20 columns were “negative.”

The only “positive” piece was penned by Richard Goldstone (of the infamous Goldstone Report), in which he defended Israel against the slanderous charge of Apartheid.

Yet your decision to publish that op-ed came a few months after your paper reportedly rejected Goldstone’s previous submission.  In that earlier piece, which was ultimately published in the Washington Post, the man who was quoted the world over for alleging that Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza, fundamentally changed his position.   According to the New York Times op-ed page, that was apparently news unfit to print.

Your refusal to publish “positive” pieces about Israel apparently does not stem from a shortage of supply.   It was brought to my attention that the Majority Leader and Minority Whip of the U.S.  House of Representatives jointly submitted an op-ed to your paper in September opposing the Palestinian action at the United Nations and supporting the call of both Israel and the Obama administration for direct negotiations without preconditions.   In an age of intense partisanship, one would have thought that strong bipartisan support for Israel on such a timely issue would have made your cut.
So with all due respect to your prestigious paper, you will forgive us for declining your offer.  We wouldn’t want to be seen as “Bibiwashing” the op-ed page of the New York Times.

Sincerely,

Ron Dermer
Senior advisor to Prime Minister Netanyahu

© 2012 mikessdesk.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Maintained By: DMBDesigns.com