http://betfree.oneminutesite.it

 
Share

The White House Washington

 

March 16, 2012

Dear Mike:

Thank you for writing. I have heard from many Americans concerned about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and I appreciate your perspective. I remain committed to a sustained diplomatic effort to promote peace in the region, because achieving a secure and lasting peace is critical not only for Israelis and Palestinians, but also for their neighbors and the United States.

Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict demands our immediate and continued attention. For generations, the conflict has taken a terrible human toll, and continued instability in the Middle East makes us all less safe. We must open a more hopeful chapter in the story of the Holy Land.

Through comprehensive and sustained efforts, we can achieve the goal of two states: a Jewish state of Israel and a viable Palestinian state, living side by side in peace and security. This approach requires working with Israelis, Palestinians, and other stakeholders over the long term, and my Administration will do just that.

I encourage you to join me online and read more about my Administration’s approach to this complex issue and other critical foreign policy matters at: www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/foreign_policy.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts.

Sincerely,

Barack Obama

 
Share

Discover what happens when one family finds out they are being moved to the Middle East for business.

 

 
Share

Rabbi’s Commentary

An Absurd and Insulting Charge

Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein

February 23, 2012

Dear Friend of Israel,

If it weren’t so tragic, it would be laughable – calling Israel an apartheid state, comparing the one true democracy in the Middle East to the oppressive legal system once in use in South Africa. But that’s exactly what the organizers of the annual “Israel Apartheid Week” (IAW) believe. Their event takes place on college campuses around the world beginning early next week, as they seek “to educate people about the nature of Israel as an apartheid system.”

Under South African apartheid, black people were subject to laws that controlled practically every aspect of their public behavior and completely segregated them from the ruling white minority. It was a brutal system that thankfully was dismantled in the early 1990s after years of intense internal and international pressure.

The question remains: How could the word “apartheid,” which describes an evil system of institutionalized segregation, discrimination, and domination based on race, possibly be applied to Israel? IAW organizers wrongly use it to make the claim that the treatment of Arabs in Israeli society and the treatment of black South Africans under apartheid is similar.

How ridiculous. In apartheid-era South Africa, black citizens were totally disenfranchised and relegated to the status of second-class citizens. In Israel, on the other hand, both Jewish and Arab citizens have equal protection under the law, enjoy freedom of religion and speech, and have full voting rights. Arab-Israeli members are present in Israel’s 120-member parliament, the Knesset.

Benjamin Pogrund, a South African Jew now living in Israel who saw firsthand the horrible oppression and misery caused by apartheid in his native country, spelled out the absurdity of this comparison in a 2005 essay. “Two years ago I had major surgery in a Jerusalem hospital,” he wrote. “The surgeon was Jewish, the anesthetist was Arab, the doctors and nurses who looked after me were Jews and Arabs. Jews and Arabs share meals in restaurants and travel on the same trains, buses and taxis, and visit each other’s homes. Could any of this possibly have happened under apartheid? Of course not.”

Sadly, the truth, and real-life examples like Pogrund’s, means nothing to IAW organizers and their ilk. Anyone who promotes the idea of Israel as an “apartheid state” is either ignorant or motivated by bias against the Jewish state so intense that facts and truth no longer have any meaning to them.

We’ve mobilized to help fight this blatant anti-Israel prejudice. Be sure to visit our 4Zion website for resources that can help you counter the lies of Israel Apartheid Week. Now is a time for Israel’s friends to stand up and be counted — and that is exactly what I hope you will do today.

There is, of course, real oppression in the world. In Syria, anti-government demonstrators are shot and killed by the dozens nearly every day. Iran’s government has done the same to demonstrators who take to the streets against that country’s harsh Islamist regime. In Saudi Arabia, there is no such thing as freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of assembly, and women are second-class citizens under the law.

And yet, Israel Apartheid Week protesters focus their indignation on one country – tiny, democratic Israel. In doing so, they reveal their true motives – not to seek justice for Palestinians or to promote peace, but to defame the Jewish state. Those who use these dishonest, underhanded tactics reveal much about their own hatreds and biases – and nothing about Israel.

With prayers for shalom, peace,


Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein
President

 
Share

Silence. Just silence from the U.N. Silence from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. And silence from major media outlets throughout the world.

Imagine for just a moment if this were happening to cities in, say, Texas. Imagine that the citizens of El Paso, Laredo and San Antonio have to stay inside their homes. Schools are closed, businesses are shut and people have to suspend their lives. Not because of some natural disaster or a nuclear or chemical accident, because groups in Mexico have purchased and are firing thousands of deadly missiles at Texans across the border. Sometimes a school is hit, sometimes a grocery store, and every so often someone is killed.

Imagine a similar occurrence in Seattle, Detroit or Cleveland – with rockets raining in from Canada

Your reaction to this imagined scenario is, no doubt, incredulity. The very thought of terrorists in another country attacking Americans at random is ludicrous. You know the president would immediately order the U.S. military to respond, root out the terrorists and make sure that the Canadian or Mexican governments clearly understood that this behaviour would not be tolerated.
The United Nations Security Council would immediately condemn this infringement on a country’s sovereignty and the safety of its citizens. The U.N. charter makes a country’s self-defense as legal as it is logical. This is universally understood. So if it is natural to be outraged and support the defense against terrorists who attack Texas, or England or Russia or China, why is it not natural to support the same for Israel? In the last two months of 2011, more than 70 rockets and missiles have rained down on southern Israel from the Gaza Strip, which remains under the control of the Hamas terrorist organisation‘;l,, while Israel’s densely populated northern towns were hit by rockets fired from Lebanon.

Hamas deliberately fires rockets into the heart of Israel’s major cities, which have exploded on playgrounds, near kindergarten classrooms and homes. A man was killed when a rocket struck his car on his evening commute home. Many more people have been injured. In November 2011 alone, more than a million Israelis had to stay home from work and more than 200,000 students were unable to attend school. You don’t read about this because if it’s covered at all, it’s buried in the back pages of newspapers.

Although these horrific attacks should appall good people everywhere, not one word of condemnation has come from the Security Council in the United Nations. Peace activists that regularly criticize my country are silent on this one as well.

Underlying the violence that continues to emanate from Gaza is a deeply rooted culture of incitement. Would-be Palestinian suicide bomber Wafa al-Biss was released from prison as part of an exchange for kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit. Al-Biss offered a breathtaking challenge to cheering school children at her Hamas welcome-home rally. She said, “I hope you will walk the same path that we took and, God willing, we will see some of you as martyrs.” Her crime? She tried to kill doctors, nurses and patients by blowing herself up in an Israeli hospital. Luckily, she failed to detonate.

These are the poisonous values that are being fed to the next generation of children in Gaza. When Israel looks at children, it sees the future. When Hamas looks at children, it sees suicide bombers and human shields. If only incitement were confined to Gaza. It also pervades the official institutions of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank – and many other corners of our region.

In schools, mosques and media, generation after generation of children across the Middle East have been taught to hate, vilify and dehumanize Israelis and Jews.

The intolerance all too common in the Middle East finds its way around the world, even entering the halls of the U.N.  Today the U.N. is home to a triple standard; one standard for democracies, a different standard for dictatorships and a special, unobtainable standard for Israel. So I pose this critical question, not from a philosophy course at a great university but based very much in the real world; If it it not OK to fire rockets at the citizens of any of the other 193 member states that make up the United Nations, why is the world silent when the victims are Israelis?

Ron Prosor is Israel’s permanent representative to the United Nations.
Israel & Christians Today, February 2012 edition.  www.c4israel.org

 
Share

Israel’s Side in the Middle East Conflict

 Ever since the late forties there has been trouble in the Middle East. The Arabs, Jewish people and the Muslims have all claimed this area as their Holy Land and say that they have a claim to the area by divine intervention.

 In the late forties the country of Israel was formed and control was given to the Jewish population. Then through a very complicated series of events, there ended up being two main groups of people vying for power and control of one the most important city in the world from a religious standpoint, Jerusalem.

 Another complicating part is that due to its religious significance people of all three backgrounds take pilgrimages there every year. In today’s era the two sides still having a conflict are the Israelites and the Palestinians. Both claim the land in and around what is known as the Gaza Strip and there has been many a conflict over this area.

The people of Israel seem to favor having a two state area, meaning that part of the area will belong to Israel and part will belong to the Palestine people. While this solution seems to make sense and should bring the whole conflict to an end it is not that easy.

 First no one can agree on where the border between Israel and the new Palestine state would be. Second as soon as the two sides come close to an agreement, then the Arabs and the other interested parties stir up problems and renew hostilities. In other words there seems to be many different sides in the conflict, and one wonders if their will ever be total peace.

 It is not for lack of trying that there has not been a solution as there was a group of concerned countries that where acting as mediators on the negotiations until one side would do something the other did not like and then the negotiations would break off.

 Finding a solution to any problem is always possible as long as the decision makers are motivated to find a solution, what has to be taken into account with the situation in the Middle East is that not everyone is as motivated as they should be to find a solution to this problem.

 Is there an answer in the Middle East? Perhaps there is, however is there ever going to be an Israel, Jerusalem that does not need to be worried about the Palestinians? The solution to this problem will never be settled until everyone involved decides that it is time for peace. Is it possible?

© 2012 mikessdesk.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Maintained By: DMBDesigns.com